- From: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 21:02:49 -0500
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: chaals@yandex-team.ru, Robin Wilton <wilton@isoc.org>, Joseph Hall Lorenzo <joe@cdt.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Wenning Rigo <rigo@w3.org>, "public-privacy mailing list) (W3C" <public-privacy@w3.org>
thanks for clarifying - this persona perspective is important. again, it looks like (social) trust is needed that server will honor user expectation however, similar to DNT. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch www.fjhirsch.com @fjhirsch > On Jan 29, 2015, at 9:43 AM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Jan 29, 2015, at 15:33 , chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote: >> >> Basically +1… more inline > > yay, I think you have it and we’re converging. Yes, the [priest+doctor | server] clearly knows that it’s Chaals under both personae; but as you say, [he it] is being respectful that in one case they are treating your body and the other your soul, and keeps those considerations separate. > > Yes, it’s like encountering your shrink at a party. He knows it’s you, you know he knows; but he doesn’t expose in this context (the party) what he knows from the other context (the analysis sessions). That is respecting your privacy. > > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > >
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 02:04:49 UTC