- From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:48:54 -0400
- To: public-privacy@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 3/11/14, 11:01 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > > On 03/11/2014 03:03 PM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote: >> The guidelines in RFC 6973 are in no way systematic; they are >> probably better characterized as a point or one-time evaluation. >> They are meant to be a set of considerations that IETF >> specifications should respond to before Area Director review, and >> the AD can require specification editors to include text >> addressing those issues. > > Joe, could you explain your criticism regarding RFC 6973? > > Regarding the question about when to do the review RFC 6973 does > not mandate a specific style. In the IETF, as you know, reviews are > done in all stages of the document life-cycle (not only during IESG > review). I didn't mean it as a critique necessarily... just a statement of the model of review that IETF currently supports. It seemed to be that the w3c process is so different that having more specific elements sprinkled throughout the standards process might be a good alternative. Of course, the desire to make this not a chore for PING or WG participants is a big part of what we can reasonably do here... which is why I think a two part solution may be good in the short term: 1. Have something solid in place for newly chartered activities that incorporates PING and privacy (trainings, privacy consideration input into draft charters). 2. Try and enhance or profile the 6973 guidelines for web standards such that we're comfortable that it will do some real good in what Frank talks about in the "go-live" sign-off... but that clearly must happen at the Working Draft stage. I'm a total noob, so please teach me where I'm being naive and we'll move on to do great things. best, Joe - -- Joseph Lorenzo Hall Chief Technologist Center for Democracy & Technology 1634 I ST NW STE 1100 Washington DC 20006-4011 (p) 202-407-8825 (f) 202-637-0968 joe@cdt.org PGP: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10 1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTHzBmAAoJEF+GaYdAqahx+R8P/2KAmtthQ219q6u429ZvzjRn r7Y/5+CvOKtL3E8NsIj+8QIPHyzDgI1LW/q7gsdJvs/1ocuAkTOGZgmFTv+p8LIP +Y6Cc/hwfi8l95Z8WYSXANlco7HiYppZzXo/w8zrZpYDER/qylMQP4Lvd6jQoqtJ US63/eb8LdB5gwKGF5uM/Xp2OcQCh19ORB8mukIDhuv0CeeIg9KhNUXdwfkULuaS amfSt+XslOw7uAe/NnFBXSjt3z5K5yGUY4ee8taqA99qR8FHwgF0fkGh7r4UjUGs G6o2wBnSG8GzqSkuozIuWKPDJ1twM3H0kp7xeA3VKd42jQxE9ibl7S9Dg5HQDRSM E4XKDRvVqC1+NI8guSb4pu2y8/YBVRvwVIi7jTvytQFkwOPRI798mBxyBD07+9eR xD1Od2Hh9mfFtfDt4ummQc51K3GIP7w7W+ygLKWE+aawrxcV3e+KWRLQHiA9oaFy kbO6BbWDLKbnYillA2JWS6eGqkqn0ysuv3rL76rZ5I0yherkbik+9awG8AfJEfjY RGumCLa46Q9eE0Zno25BEii67fdZrWTZKJEFK7Q5OYFqLt477q8Q4k6wrjbrg5AC nIGAxwzuinUmt2Rr3J4WS4H5vSM8InoJVREirqs8qrpmDMj7XxHHpoLrGs+esSPi NXQugPKXgcrb8Bd6ZXAM =fx8Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:49:23 UTC