On 03/11/2014 03:03 PM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote: > The guidelines in RFC 6973 are in no way systematic; they are probably > better characterized as a point or one-time evaluation. They are meant > to be a set of considerations that IETF specifications should respond > to before Area Director review, and the AD can require specification > editors to include text addressing those issues. Joe, could you explain your criticism regarding RFC 6973? Regarding the question about when to do the review RFC 6973 does not mandate a specific style. In the IETF, as you know, reviews are done in all stages of the document life-cycle (not only during IESG review).
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:11:31 UTC