- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 19:57:10 -0000 (GMT)
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
Something that xmlroff stumbled on a week or so ago... The XSL 1.1 definition of the <length> datatype [1] is: <length> A signed length value where a 'length' is a real number plus a unit qualification. A property may define additional constraints on the value. The definition of 'border-top-width' (which, by its black border [3], is denoted as copied from CSS2) has a link to the CSS2 definition of 'border-top-width' [4], which has a link to the CSS2 definition of border width [5], which has a link to the CSS2 definition of the <length> datatype [6], which includes: After a zero length, the unit identifier is optional. So, is 'border-top-width="0"' allowed by XSL 1.1? If it is, is "0" allowed for FO-only properties such as 'rule-thickness' [7]? Regards, Tony. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#datatype [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#border-top-width [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#d0e15664 [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/box.html#propdef-border-top-width [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/box.html#value-def-border-width [6] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/syndata.html#value-def-length [7] http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#rule-thickness
Received on Wednesday, 1 January 2014 19:57:32 UTC