W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ppl@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Workflow - on the wiki

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:22:12 +0000
Message-ID: <CAEncD4ejEkReMFhB7sPUg1ybHvR1fdzm=b-oq+RpXFGAAbe_UA@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-ppl@w3.org
On 20 March 2012 16:56, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:
> On 20/03/2012 16:37, Dave Pawson wrote:
>> I'm speaking of authoring at the xsl-fo level David? Not at the XSLT
>> with embedded xsl-fo ?  Is that what you meant?
> Yes I know, but what I mean is, the logic that attribute content should
> be restricted to types easily expressed in a relaxng grammar would, if
> applied to xslt, mean getting rid of xpath. Given that, I'm not sure
> that that is a good logic to apply to xsl-fo. (There may be other
> reasons for changing, but I can't agree that that is a good one.)

In which case leave those as 'unable to be validated' using a grammar,
or add them to the list for Schematron / as and when?

It's not those expressions I'm aiming at currently.


Dave Pawson
Docbook FAQ.
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 17:22:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:57:24 UTC