W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ppl@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Is the group about "Print and Page Layout" or about XSL-FO ?

From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 20:22:35 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAK2GfEbb_Mwr7yq3FVaKD2XnVaMcTYu3XJE1=eG9EpAkFDi4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Cc: public-ppl@w3.org
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 8 March 2012 19:00, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I thing that trying to ignore the work done by CSS is a huge mistake
>
> I don't think we are making that mistake at all.
>

Good !

>
>
>
> >
> > So finding the good fit of each of the different attempt to solve the
> Print
> > and Page Layout is a good start and seems the natural fit for a Community
> > Group in order to find the "next step"
>
> To my knowledge no one has tried to meld the work of the two groups.
> We have found areas of fit, and others that simply don't fit.
>
> The obvious one is the place that XSLT has as part of an XSL-FO workflow?
> That seems not to fit with CSS IMHO?
>
> Generate a toc, index etc. Not good fit?
>
> How to handle that sort of mismatch?
>

Why do you see it as a mismatch instead of a added value to XSL-FO ?

Who said that only one should survive ?

We have DTD, Relax NG and XML Schema and each of them has useful fit

I don't believe in One Size Fits All

Mohamed


>
>
> regards
>
>
> --
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> Docbook FAQ.
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 19:22:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 8 March 2012 19:22:59 GMT