- From: Stasinos Konstantopoulos <konstant@iit.demokritos.gr>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 19:08:29 +0300
- To: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
I don't believe dcterms:issued is a problem, as it is an rdf:Property so OWL semantics is not pertinent. We would have had problems with wdrs:issuedby because it would have had to be an owl:ObjectProperty in order to have a range involving an owl:unionOf construct. We can leave in *single* rdf:range triples of rdf:Properties. s On Tue Oct 7 17:54:24 2008 Andrea Perego said: > > +1 from me either. > > A further note: this applies to all the POWDER-S properties used in the > attribution (i.e., wdrs:validFrom, wdrs:validUntil, dcterms:issued). > Another consequence is that we cannot use dcterms:issued, since in [1] > it is defined as a subproperty of both dc:date and dcterms:date, and > also its range is defined (RDFS Literal). > > This means that we have to define a new property: wdrs:issued > > Andrea >
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2008 16:09:38 UTC