W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > October 2008


From: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:40:28 +0100
Message-Id: <2696E355-457F-45BB-B748-D7FEC42698F9@g5n.co.uk>
Cc: <public-powderwg@w3.org>
To: "Smith, Kevin, ((R&D)) VF-Group" <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com>

On 3 Oct 2008, at 10:12, Smith, Kevin, ((R&D)) VF-Group wrote:

> Good question -  I had started in XSLT 1.0 but changed to XSLT 2.0 to
> utilise the replace() function: the part I was having trouble with was
> to ensure that a host, e.g.

As I understand it (and I may be wrong), there are three flavours of  

* POWDER, the easy-to-author XML format.
* POWDER-BASE, identical to above, but with all the matching stuff  
compiled into regexps.
* POWDER-S, the RDF version.

Going from POWDER to POWDER-BASE or to POWDER-S may be difficult  
without the string processing ability of XSLT 2.0. But going from  
POWDER-BASE to POWDER-S should be more achievable with XSLT 1.0, as  
the regular expressions shouldn't need any changes.

Personably I'd be happy enough with a POWDER-BASE to POWDER-S  
transformation in XSLT 1.0. I could hanndle POWDER to POWDER-BASE as  
a pre-transformation step.

Toby A Inkster
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 09:41:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:06:04 UTC