RE: Comments on Nov-14 WD for ITS IG

Hi Phil,

> OK, now I'm being a little lazy - because I'm trying to 
> expedite this ASAP and I admit to only having seen the 
> ITS doc for the first time this afternoon. You've kindly 
> sent us an ITS rules file - is the idea that every POWDER 
> doc should link to this? Or at least, every POWDER doc 
> that includes localised tags? Or should we embed the 
> rules in the schema?

The idea is that the rules document is available to whoever needs to localize or preform some linguistic-related tasks on the
document.

It is certainly not necessary to have the rules in every document instance.
Including them in the schema could be a good way to make sure it's readily accessible.
Or it could be a separate document (with a link to it in the spec). From the view point of the ITS processor it doesn't really
matter.

-yves