W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > December 2008

Re: Comments on Nov-14 WD for ITS IG

From: Stasinos Konstantopoulos <konstant@iit.demokritos.gr>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:50:49 +0200
To: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>
Cc: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>, public-powderwg@w3.org, public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <20081218145049.GI4021@iit.demokritos.gr>

On Thu Dec 18 13:52:38 2008 Phil Archer said:

> However, all the textual elements are essentially annotations and so
> need not be restricted.

Except for tags, which are datatype properties and visible to reasoners,
so due care is called for. Good news is, I tried Pellet and it didn't
blink an eye: a slight variation of DR example 2-14 where the definition
of tagset_1 goes like

    <owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
      <owl:Restriction>
        <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#tag" />
        <owl:hasValue xml:lang="en">New Releases</owl:hasValue>
      </owl:Restriction>
      <owl:Restriction>
        <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#tag" />
        <owl:hasValue xml:lang="nl">Nieuwe Releases</owl:hasValue>
      </owl:Restriction>
    </owl:intersectionOf>

works just fine (that is, our Semantic PP returns both wdrs:tag triples
with their xml:lang attribute).

s
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2008 14:52:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:14 GMT