W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > December 2008

Re: POWDER depends on a Note for date syntax?

From: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:56:38 +0000
Message-ID: <493568C6.7040307@philarcher.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: public-powderwg <public-powderwg@w3.org>

Thank you. The reference to W3C DTF will be replaced with the XML data 
type.

Dan Connolly wrote:
> I see:
> 
> "The issued, validfrom, and validuntil elements in POWDER documents MUST
> contain a W3C DTF literal value."
> http://www.w3.org/TR/powder-formal/#powderBaseAttribution
> 
> A normative dependency on a W3C Note doesn't seem like a good idea.
> I suggest using the XSD spec as the definition of date syntax.
> 
> 
> XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition
> W3C Recommendation 28 October 2004
> This version:
>         http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/ 

-- 

Phil Archer
w. http://philarcher.org/
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 16:57:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:13 GMT