- From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:40:18 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- CC: public-powderwg@w3.org
Noted. Sounds sensible to me. Phil. Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > I think it would be a simplification to the POWDER design to merge > includePorts and includePortRanges so that > > <wdr:includePorts>80 81 87 100-103 105-106</wdr:includePorts> > > would identify the following ports > > 80, 81, 87, 100, 101, 102, 103, 105, 106. > > It may also be worthwhile (whether or not you accept the merge > suggestion), to clarify that no whitespace is permitted in a range like > 100-103 > >
Received on Friday, 21 December 2007 11:40:35 UTC