Re: thoughts towards a draft AR WG charter

On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:41 +0200, Jens de Smit wrote:
> Mapping specifically to IP (v4? v6?) sounds a bit... limited. Data could
> be coming from any byte stream or packet stream. IPv4/v6 is a likely
> candidate in an internet situation, but we shouldn't exclude local files
> or things like Bluetooth in Personal Area Networks.

Hi Jens, 

I think that's an excellent point.  And this will fragment more over
time too (although ipv6 is really meant to enable this type of IOT)


roBman

Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2010 04:08:17 UTC