Re: Agenda items for call on Tuesday?

I doubt TECG will have anything urgent this week. How about just make it a
PEWG call, and if we and up having any TE business to discuss (which I
doubt), we can do it at the end.
On Mar 15, 2015 8:29 PM, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:

> On 16/03/2015 00:23, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
>> [ + public-pointer-events ]
>>
>> Hi Rick, All
>>
>> I don't have anything specific for the TECG but I was thinking about
>> having a PEWG call on March 17 to talk about status and next steps for
>> PEWG.
>>
>> However, given substantial membership overlap between these two groups
>> and their voice conference slots overlapping, I'm not sure how to
>> proceed. One option is to split the hour at xx:30, but if TECG needs
>> more time, perhaps I should just go ahead and create a separate meeting
>> for PEWG. What do folks prefer: split the hour or separate meetings at
>> different time and/or day?
>>
>
> Either split the hour (assuming the TECG part isn't cancelled for lack of
> substantial items, in which case we can probably have the full hour), or
> reschedule separately...but either way I'd be interested in hearing about
> status/next steps for PE.
>
>
>
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>