W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > October to December 2013

RE: Impact of pointer capture on pointerover/pointerout events

From: <Cathy.Chan@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:43:13 +0000
To: <rbyers@google.com>, <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>, <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>
CC: <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
Message-ID: <A46437648ECB3D4F852B077AFF9099F52933A45A@008-AM1MPN2-082.mgdnok.nokia.com>
 I don't have anything to add (yet) except a link to the original thread:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013AprJun/0120.html

- Cathy.

> From: ext Rick Byers [mailto:rbyers@google.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:43 PM
> To: Scott González; Jacob Rossi
> Cc: public-pointer-events@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Impact of pointer capture on pointerover/pointerout events
> 
> Reviving this old thread - I don't think we ever talked about it on a call
> (I was away for the following call and it looks like we never re-scheduled
> discussing of it).
> 
> The Microsoft test submission says it expects to receive a pointerover
> event in exactly this scenario (
> https://github.com/InternetExplorer/web-platform-tests/blob/ddffbdc5edd63c972b9ee42df1f161fc17778125/pointerevents/capture.html#L16),
> but it's not actually validating that it happens and IE11 appears not to do
> it.
> 
> I think we need some clarity on what the spec intends here.  Is IE11's
> behavior correct?
> 
> Thanks,
>    Rick
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Should we explicitly specify that?
>>>
>>
>> I wouldn't expect any over/out events during capture.
>>
>> Also should we explicitly specify the meaning of relatedTarget for the
>>> pointer events analogous to the mouse events?
>>>
>>
>> This seems like a good idea.
>>
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 21:50:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:20:25 UTC