W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > January to March 2013

Comments on 19-Feb-2013 LCWD of Pointer Events

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:13:49 -0400
Message-ID: <5147757D.4000608@nokia.com>
To: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
A few non-substantive comments and Qs re the 19 February 2013 LCWD of 
Pointer Events:

* Glossary - I think it would improve readability to move the Glossary 
to the front of the spec (before the terms are used). Add "hit test" to 
the Glossary.

* 7.{1,2}#1 - these two sections says setPointerCapture and 
releasePointerCapture can throw a DOMException. As such, perhaps but the 
definition of these two methods should mention the exception (when 
pointerId is bogus)

* 7.{1.2} - does InvalidPointerId need to be documented in some 
spec/registry?

* 8.1 - first sentence includes "... dispatch a pointer event from for 
device that ..." and that doesn't read quite right (perhaps there is an 
extra word in that clause).

* 8.1#4 - should "pointerleave, then dispatch a pointerleave event" be 
"pointerleave, then dispatch a mouseleave event"? (Same question for 
8.2#5 i.e. if event is pointerleave, is pointerleave dispatched or 
mouseleave?)

* 8.2#2 - the text at the end says to dispatch a "mousemove event", 
should that be "mouseover event"?
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 20:14:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:17:04 GMT