Re: Comments from PLING to MAWG

Hello Renato,

just a clarification question: Do you request just "ma:policy", which has
the value URI, and no normative processing requirements for implementations
of the ontology? I am asking since you wrote "We do not  expect that every
application will understand the policy at the end of the URI".

Best,

Felix
2009/10/22 Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>

>
> Dear W3C Media Annotations WG chairs, the W3C Policy Language  Interest
> Group (PLING) would like to offer the following comments and suggestions:
>
> =========
> The PLING would like to see greater support for links to
> machine-interpretable policies as part of the web architecture. We recommend
>  that the Media Annotations WG strongly consider this requirement for
> the "Ontology for Media Resource" WD [1]. Specifically, we suggest  that
> "ma:policy" be supported as a link (URI) to a policy. We do not  expect that
> every application will understand the policy at the end of
> the URI, but they will at least be aware of the policy, and for those  that
> do (such as CC [2], ODRL [3] etc) can then provide an improved  service as
> the user interacts with the media.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-mediaont-10-20090618/
> [2] http://creativecommons.org/choose/
> [3] http://odrl.net/2.0/DS-ODRL-Model.html
>
> ==========
>
> We look forward to your comments and response.
>
> Cheers...  Renato Iannella (on behalf of the PLING)
>
>
>
>
>