ah, sorry I was looking at the wrong document! All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:56:06 +0300 Thaddeus Cambron <follow.the.brush@gmail.com> wrote ---- I have made a suggestion in the doc for PO, P1. It's too early here for me to remember what I suggested but if you look at the document you will see. I will look at vocab vars once I wake up a little. Best Thad On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, 4:44 AM lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: Can we think of better names then p0,p1, p2? Also, can we have a better way to write vocab500 vocab1000 etc? maybe vocab[1000] where 1000 is a paremeter? or how we are doing variables in module 1 All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:16:28 +0300 Cambron, James <jjc6476@psu.edu> wrote ---- > > Good Morning, > > I think it would be useful to get additional eyes on this document: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kW2druI59AOuLQKjWHwcfq9RaYwAA0V0mapPCfIiLD8/edit?usp=sharing > > > Goals: > Please let me know if I am headed in the expected direction > Is there something additional I should be doing? > In the initial document there were comments/concerns raised by a couple of reviewers. It may be beneficial to resolve these as some appear to be > a month old. > > Best, > Thaddeus > >
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2018 15:39:53 UTC