Re: COGA Vocabulary

I have made a suggestion in the doc for PO, P1. It's too early here for me
to remember what I suggested but if you look at the document you will see.
I will look at vocab  vars once I wake up a little.

Best
Thad

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, 4:44 AM lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> Can we think of better names then p0,p1, p2?
>
> Also, can we have a better way to write vocab500 vocab1000 etc? maybe
> vocab[1000] where 1000 is a paremeter?  or how we are doing variables in
> module 1
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn, Twitter
>
>
>
>
>  ---- On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:16:28 +0300 Cambron, James <jjc6476@psu.edu>
> wrote ----
>  >
>  >     Good Morning,
>  >
>  >  I think it would be useful to get additional eyes on this document:
>  >
>  >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kW2druI59AOuLQKjWHwcfq9RaYwAA0V0mapPCfIiLD8/edit?usp=sharing
>  >
>  >
>  >  Goals:
>  >   Please let me know if I am headed in the expected direction
>  > Is there something additional I should be doing?
>  > In the initial document there were comments/concerns raised by a couple
> of reviewers. It may be beneficial to resolve these as some appear to be >
> a  month old.
>  >
>  >  Best,
>  >  Thaddeus
>  >
>  >
>
>
>