- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:10:55 -0400
- To: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>, Web Payments Working Group <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
On 09/12/2016 06:00 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie wrote: > Could the following minor changes be made to make this clearer Hey Adrian, Yes, we can and should make most of those changes. We didn't make them during the CfC because we didn't want the document changing out from underneath folks. Now that the Transition Request is in, we can start making modifications again. Here are the changes that have been made based on your input: 1. I've merged your PR (and attempted to properly resolve the merge conflicts). Based on your comments, I think that there is still a disconnect on the purpose of this API. We hope to resolve some of that misalignment at the upcoming face-to-face meeting. 2. I've updated the diagram based on your suggestions. Let us know if that works for you: https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-http-api/ -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Advancing the Web Payments HTTP API and Core Messages http://manu.sporny.org/2016/yes-to-http-api/
Received on Monday, 12 September 2016 15:11:24 UTC