W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-p3p-spec@w3.org > August 2005

RE: Base Data Schema definition

From: Giles Hogben <giles.hogben@jrc.it>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:01:40 +0200
To: "'Lorrie Cranor'" <lorrie+@cs.cmu.edu>
Cc: "'Rigo Wenning'" <rigo@w3.org>, "'public-p3p-spec'" <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
Message-id: <009801c5a7e2$cdc9d050$432abf8b@cs.jrc.it>

No I'm not suggesting that. The import is of the P3P 1.0 schema not the
P3P1.0 base data schema (which is not an XSD schema and therefore can't be
imported) because you need to use the yes/no attribute (and we would like to
use the optional attribute)

>**-----Original Message-----
>**From: public-p3p-spec-request@w3.org 
>**[mailto:public-p3p-spec-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lorrie Cranor
>**Sent: 23 August 2005 14:54
>**To: giles.hogben@jrc.it
>**Cc: Rigo Wenning; 'public-p3p-spec'
>**Subject: Re: Base Data Schema definition
>**
>**
>**
>**So Giles is proposing that the new P3P 1.1 base data schema import  
>**the old P3P 1.0 base data schema by reference? If so, then probably  
>**no reason to reproduce the 1.0 schema in 1.1. But maybe that is not  
>**what you are asking?
>**
>**Lorrie
>**
>**
>**On Aug 23, 2005, at 4:00 AM, giles.hogben@jrc.it wrote:
>**
>**> xsd:import looks closed to me.
>**> It validated so the syntax should  be OK.
>**> Fine to change the namespace.
>**>
>**> Not sure I understand the last question. I would leave that up to
>**> Lorrie.
>**>
>**>
>**> ----- Original Message -----
>**> From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
>**> Date: Thursday, August 18, 2005 2:30 pm
>**> Subject: Base Data Schema definition
>**>
>**>
>**> Giles,
>**>
>**> in your new base data schema draft, you start like this:
>**>
>**> <xsd:schema
>**>   xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>**>   xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1"
>**>   xmlns:p3p="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1"
>**>   xmlns:p3pbds="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1"
>**>   elementFormDefault="qualified"
>**>   targetNamespace="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1">
>**>      <xsd:import
>**>       schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1.xsd"
>**>       namespace="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1" />
>**>
>**> I think, the targetNamespace MUST be something different. 
>**It should  
>**> be a
>**> new namespace. Suggestion is /2005/08/BDS-P3P11
>**>
>**> You fail to close <xsd:import>
>**>
>**> Does that mean, the old 1.0 Schema should be replaced in the Spec  
>**> as it
>**> is already in the 1.0 REC and can be imported from there? 
>**Or should we
>**> provide a combined XML Schema?
>**>
>**> Best,
>**>
>**> Rigo
>**>
>**
>**
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2005 13:01:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 23 August 2005 13:01:57 GMT