W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-p3p-spec@w3.org > August 2005

Re: Base Data Schema definition

From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie+@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:54:18 -0400
Message-Id: <F960D9E9-02AE-469F-A695-EC0BC2235CB2@cs.cmu.edu>
Cc: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, "'public-p3p-spec'" <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
To: giles.hogben@jrc.it

So Giles is proposing that the new P3P 1.1 base data schema import  
the old P3P 1.0 base data schema by reference? If so, then probably  
no reason to reproduce the 1.0 schema in 1.1. But maybe that is not  
what you are asking?

Lorrie


On Aug 23, 2005, at 4:00 AM, giles.hogben@jrc.it wrote:

> xsd:import looks closed to me.
> It validated so the syntax should  be OK.
> Fine to change the namespace.
>
> Not sure I understand the last question. I would leave that up to  
> Lorrie.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
> Date: Thursday, August 18, 2005 2:30 pm
> Subject: Base Data Schema definition
>
>
> Giles,
>
> in your new base data schema draft, you start like this:
>
> <xsd:schema
>   xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>   xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1"
>   xmlns:p3p="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1"
>   xmlns:p3pbds="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1"
>   elementFormDefault="qualified"
>   targetNamespace="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1">
>      <xsd:import
>       schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1.xsd"
>       namespace="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1" />
>
> I think, the targetNamespace MUST be something different. It should  
> be a
> new namespace. Suggestion is /2005/08/BDS-P3P11
>
> You fail to close <xsd:import>
>
> Does that mean, the old 1.0 Schema should be replaced in the Spec  
> as it
> is already in the 1.0 REC and can be imported from there? Or should we
> provide a combined XML Schema?
>
> Best,
>
> Rigo
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2005 12:54:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 23 August 2005 12:54:53 GMT