W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-p3p-spec@w3.org > September 2004

Re: no extension element allowed in entity element

From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie+@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:14:21 -0400
Message-Id: <629C8682-1243-11D9-B166-000A95DA3F5A@cs.cmu.edu>
Cc: 'public-p3p-spec' <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>

But there is nothing else in the data-group element except data 
references, so what is there to re-invent?

What I am suggesting is we keep the old data-group element as is and we 
include an extension in the ENTITY element that has the new format  for 
the data-group element. Old user agents can ignore the extension. New 
user agents can ignore the data-group element.


On Sep 29, 2004, at 2:01 PM, Rigo Wenning wrote:

> Because it would mean, that we would have to re-invent the whole
> data-group element and not just the schema filling it out.
> Rigo
> Am Wednesday 29 September 2004 19:28 verlautbarte Lorrie Cranor :
>> An answer to my own question just occurred to me... why does the
>> extension have to go inside the data group element? Why can't we put
>> it in the ENTITY element itself?
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 18:14:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:02:19 UTC