Because it would mean, that we would have to re-invent the whole data-group element and not just the schema filling it out. Rigo Am Wednesday 29 September 2004 19:28 verlautbarte Lorrie Cranor : > An answer to my own question just occurred to me... why does the > extension have to go inside the data group element? Why can't we put > it in the ENTITY element itself? >Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 18:01:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.1.1 : Wednesday, 29 September 2004 18:01:19 GMT