W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-p3p-spec@w3.org > October 2003

RE: AGENDA: 1 Oct P3P spec call

From: Stampley, David A <David_Stampley@reyrey.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 10:34:28 -0400
Message-ID: <E8D4EE6BF5F18243A242B376BE0FA53F02A085CB@oh18ex04.reyrey.com>
To: "'Rigo Wenning'" <rigo@w3.org>, public-p3p-spec <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>

Sorry I haven't offered the "court" definition I promised, and I failed to
coordinate the fact that today I'm at a conference and won't be on the call.


Frankly, I'm still struggling with what could be conveyed that would be
meaningful for what sounds like the few who might now use it.  But it might
be more important in the future.

If LAW allows a site to recite the various laws that might govern the
business (e.g., for a bank in the California, GLB, Cal. Financial Privacy
Law, California Notice of Security Breach, among others)...

COURT might not be meaningful if it had the meaning of "Authority," as in
"government agency that has jurisdiction over the privacy rules & affairs of
this business."  For a bank (Bill?) maybe that would be the OCC.  For a
state bank, it might be the AG.  Other agencies might still have some
jurisdiction, but perhaps there is one authority more important than others.

In Canada, AUTHORITY might be the Canadian equivalent of a national bank
overseer, plus the Privacy Commissioner for the nation or the province.

It's a bit like I'm trying to find a job for COURT to do.

At the bottom line, it the spec were to stay as it is and is optional, then
a given site could take it or leave it if the site is concerned about
unintended implications of using it.



Dave Stampley
v.  937-485-0424
f.  937-485-0973
david_stampley@reyrey.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:17 PM
To: public-p3p-spec
Subject: AGENDA: 1 Oct P3P spec call


The next P3P specification group conference call will be on
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 11 am - 12 pm US Eastern. Dial-in
information is available at
http://www.w3.org/P3P/Group/Specification/1.1/meetings.html

AGENDA

1. Task force reports
   - [P3P beyond HTTP - Patrick Hung]
   - Compact policies - Brooks Dobbs
   - Article 10 vocabulary issues - Giles Hogben
   - Agent and domain relationships - Jack Humphrey
   - Consent choices - Matthias Schunter
   - Converting P3P data schema to XML schema - Giles Hogben
   - [Signed P3P policies  - Giles Hogben]

2. Discussion of disputes definition issues -- see
   comments in green at http://www.w3.org/P3P/2003/p3p-translation.htm

3. Continued work on P3P 1.0 element definitions and translations
   http://www.w3.org/P3P/2003/p3p-translation.htm

4. Linking cookie data and what it means
   http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=172

5. Set date for next call (Oct. 15)
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2003 10:34:39 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 17 March 2004 17:46:28 EST