W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-p3p-spec@w3.org > July 2003

Re: [BH] The most generic binding

From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:43:56 -0400
Cc: public-p3p-spec <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>, reagle@w3.org
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Message-Id: <8BBC560B-B793-11D7-B21F-000393DC889A@research.att.com>

To add a bit more context.... such a binding would be useful in (at 
least) the following cases:

a. When you want to bind a P3P policy to an XML document that is not 
identified by a URI.

b. When you want to bind a P3P policy to a particular XML element 
within an XML document, but not to the entire document.

c. When you want to bind a P3P policy to an XML document and don't have 
the ability to use the WKL or header methods for the PRF


As I recall, there were two other ideas that were discussed that should 
probably be considered along with this:

- A referencing mechanism that is nearly identical to the HTML and 
XHTML link tags in the P3P1.0 spec that could be used with any XML 
document (this is another way to satisfy point c above)

- An extension to the PRF syntax to allow binding to a particular XML 
element at a URL rather than to the whole document at that URL (this is 
another way to satisfy point b above)

Lorrie



On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 08:12  AM, Rigo Wenning wrote:

>
> Joseph,
>
> I owe you this since a long time.
>
> The idea and solutions described below were developed as an outcome of
> the dependency - discussions with XForms.
>
> Steven Pemberton suggested a very simple binding that would allow to
> bind a P3P-Policy to arbitrary XML-Elements. He thought it would be a
> quick and short specification to do as it would define a generic
> attribute like xml lang=..[1] This could be done in a separate
> specification, but is also a possible candidate be included in the
> [beyond HTTP] stuff.
>
> So I suggest to specify an XML-attribute that can be generally used to
> point to a _Policy_ (not PRF). The binding is no issue as the attribute
> itself defines it's own binding by the element it is sitting on.
>
> In a past email, Steven Pemberton gave an example of how this could 
> look
> like[2]
>
>   1. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-lang-tag
>   2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-forms/2003JanMar/0127.html
>
> Best,
> -- 
> Rigo Wenning            W3C/ERCIM
> Policy Analyst          Privacy Activity Lead
> mail:rigo@w3.org        2004, Routes des Lucioles
> http://www.w3.org/      F-06902 Sophia Antipolis
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2003 09:41:35 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 17 March 2004 17:46:26 EST