Thanks for your message, Joseph. >My inclination is that an application will specify which bindings its SOAP >is supported with. *If* this is the case, then I would RECOMMEND that it >define the SOAP statement as being inclusive of the SOAP interaction and >the binding. Let's talk about an application and a Web service. An application is trying to call an operation (e.g., Webmethod in .Net Web Sevices) in a Web service. Thus, the Web service have toy the SOAP bindings for its oerations. >Yep, though I expect HTTP will be very common. (In fact, it was recently >reported that of Amazon's SOAP and REST (HTTP) interfaces, 85% of their >usage is of the REST interface.) > That's what the page says: > http://www.w3.org/P3P/Group/Specification/ > Wednesday 30 April 2003 11am-12pm US Eastern/16:00-17:00 UTC > Dial-in number: Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200 Code: 73794 ("P3PWG") I will be there.Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 04:48:16 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 17 March 2004 17:46:23 EST