Re: preview drafts

Ian Horrocks wrote:
> On 15 Sep 2009, at 12:06, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>> In Overview:
>> - Sect.3, 2nd parag. a link labelled "Section 5.2" is pointing to 
>> Sect.4.2 of NF&R.
>> - References: while the URLs for OWL 2 documentations are clickable, 
>> URLs for RDF Semantics, RDF Syntax and Turtle are not. Is it intentional?
> 
> I don't understand this -- they seem to be clickable to me.

Example:

  [OWL 2 Primer]
     OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Primer Pascal Hitzler, Markus 
Krötzsch, Bijan Parsia, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Sebastian Rudolph, 
eds. W3C Editor's Draft, 14 September 2009, 
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-primer-20090914/. Latest 
version available at http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/owl2-primer/.

The URLs http://www.w3.org/...etc... are hyperlinks.
The situation is the same for all OWL 2 documents.


However:

  [RDF Semantics]
     RDF Semantics. Patrick Hayes, ed., W3C Recommendation, 10 February 
2004, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-mt-20040210/. Latest version 
available as http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/.

The URLs here are not hyperlinks.
The situation is the same for all documents which are not OWL 2 specs.


Regards,
AZ.

> 
>>
>> General remarks:
>> - contributors list: most of the links are pointing towards the wiki, 
>> which usually contains only one link to their homepages. But this is 
>> not consistent across the documents (sometimes link to the wiki user 
>> page, sometimes to the homepage);
> 
> I will try to fix this.
> 
>> + Mike Smith is identified as Michael Smith in Conformance, while he 
>> is identified as Mike Smith in SS&FSS.
> 
> I'll check.
> 
> Ian
> 
> 
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> AZ
>>
>>
>> Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>> I'm cautiously optimistic that we'll finally be able to publish on Sept
>>> 24, with a 4-week comment deadline, making it possible we can advance to
>>> REC before or during ISWC.
>>> I've prepared preview drafts, linked from:
>>>    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/owl2-overview/#Documentation_Roadmap
>>> As usual, please look at the color coded diff to make sure the change
>>> description is accurate, and look at the diff from the wiki text, to
>>> make sure the publication script didn't mess anything up.  The diff from
>>> wiki is named like:
>>>    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/owl2-overview/diff-from-original
>>> Current issues:
>>>   - the "Please Comment By" text needs some work (marked with a TBD)
>>>   - NFR has a broken internal link to ref-owl-2-manchester-syntax
>>>   - XML has two broken internal links: ref-register-mime and
>>>     ref-mime-consistency
>>> We're still working on the XSD dependency issue, but otherwise I think
>>> we're in pretty good shape.    I wonder what we're forgetting?  :-)
>>>       -- Sandro
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Antoine Zimmermann
>> Post-doctoral researcher at:
>> Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> National University of Ireland, Galway
>> IDA Business Park
>> Lower Dangan
>> Galway, Ireland
>> antoine.zimmermann@deri.org
>> http://vmgal34.deri.ie/~antzim/
>>
> 


-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
Post-doctoral researcher at:
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
IDA Business Park
Lower Dangan
Galway, Ireland
antoine.zimmermann@deri.org
http://vmgal34.deri.ie/~antzim/

Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2009 15:20:02 UTC