W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2009

Re: pointing OWL 1 specs at OWL 2 specs

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:03:30 -0400
Message-ID: <1fc9c2ff0910201503jeb1fdbhd2b69c21bd88e36e@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, public-owl-wg@w3.org, ij@w3.org
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Yes, and with the color, of course! ;-)
>
> I see your point.   The example I was working from was:
>
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS1/
>
> which I really didn't like.
>
> I've made a new version with a softer color and with softer wording,
> trying to avoid any sense that there is something wrong with OWL 1.  See:
>
>    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/owl-features-revised2.html
>
> Good enough?

I like this color better; but re: wording, why not the neutral "OWL
specifications have been revised; see OWL 2 blah blah".

Cheers,
Kendall
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 22:04:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 20 October 2009 22:04:27 GMT