W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2009

Re: XML Schema

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:08:21 -0400
Message-Id: <44AE1A58-0F70-4119-8605-D951929756E7@gmail.com>
To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Cc: "<public-owl-wg@w3.org>" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-xml-serialization/

-Alan

On Oct 18, 2009, at 7:58 AM, "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de> wrote:

> [posting to public-owl-wg, not to the comments list]
>
> Hi WG!
>
> Does anybody understand the comment below? By "the normative  
> specification",
> Thorsten is probably referring to the syntactic restrictions of OWL  
> 2 DL. But
> what does he mean by "XML Schema of OWL 2"? Does he mean the owl.owl  
> file? And
> if so, what does he mean by the suggestion "to bring these  
> constraints into"
> it? Let me note that the owl.owl ontology does not contain any  
> bNodes, let
> alone bNodes occurring in axioms built from the mentioned language  
> features.
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-owl-comments-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-owl-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thorsten  
> Liebig
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:49 AM
> To: public-owl-comments@w3.org
> Subject: XML Schema
>
> According to the normative specification anonymous individuals cannot
> appear in the following axioms: SameIndividual, DifferentIndividuals,
> NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion, and NegativeDataPropertyAssertion.
>
> I suggest to bring this constraints into the XML Schema of OWL 2.
>
> Regards,
> Thorsten Liebig
>
Received on Sunday, 18 October 2009 12:09:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 18 October 2009 12:09:02 GMT