W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2009

Re: OWL 2 Quick Reference Card

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:28:31 -0400
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
cc: hoekstra@uva.nl, baojie@cs.rpi.edu, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <28532.1255523311@waldron>

> I think that Turtle would be better than N3, as the status of the Turtle
> syntax is better than the status of the N3 syntax.

Still, "RDF Syntax" is not wrong.  Turtle is an RDF syntax, right?  I'm
uncomfortable with just calling that column "Turtle Syntax".  

Some options I am okay with, from best to worst in my opinion:

      RDF Triples (Turtle)    
      RDF Triples
      RDF Syntax (Turtle)
      RDF N-Triples            [even though it's not really N-triples]

   -- Sandro


> From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
> Subject: Re: OWL 2 Quick Reference Card
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:32:27 -0500
> 
> > Hi Jie,
> > 
> > A minor issue: "RDF Syntax" should be "Turtle" (or N3)... as an RDF  
> > syntax as such does not exist.
> > 
> > Rinke
> > 
> > On 14 okt 2009, at 02:41, Jie Bao wrote:
> > 
> >> The card is offered in two sizes: A4 and Letter (8.5x11 inch) - see  
> >> attachment
> >>
> >> Please comment if you have any issue with the content, layout, pdf
> >> file, printing, etc.
> >>
> >> We need to put them on the PR page soon.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Jie
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Jie Bao
> >> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
> >> <2009-10-06_OWLqrg-Letter.pdf><2009-10-06_OWLqrg-A4.pdf>
> > 
> > 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2009 12:28:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 14 October 2009 12:28:38 GMT