- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:41:35 -0400
- To: <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- CC: <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hmm. I think that Turtle would be better than N3, as the status of the Turtle syntax is better than the status of the N3 syntax. peter From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl> Subject: Re: OWL 2 Quick Reference Card Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:32:27 -0500 > Hi Jie, > > A minor issue: "RDF Syntax" should be "Turtle" (or N3)... as an RDF > syntax as such does not exist. > > Rinke > > On 14 okt 2009, at 02:41, Jie Bao wrote: > >> The card is offered in two sizes: A4 and Letter (8.5x11 inch) - see >> attachment >> >> Please comment if you have any issue with the content, layout, pdf >> file, printing, etc. >> >> We need to put them on the PR page soon. >> >> Thanks >> >> Jie >> >> ----- >> Jie Bao >> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie >> <2009-10-06_OWLqrg-Letter.pdf><2009-10-06_OWLqrg-A4.pdf> > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2009 11:13:48 UTC