W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Fwd: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:03:29 +0100
Message-Id: <85246FA4-A3B0-4716-8023-F74F5BD19B08@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
To: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Michael Grove <mike@clarkparsia.com>
> Date: 19 May 2009 17:01:03 BDT
> To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
> Cc: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
> Subject: Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
>
> Yeah, I sent a message to the list yesterday saying it looked ok,  
> but I got the bounce saying it needed moderator approval.  I guess  
> it's still waiting for that.
>
> It looks fine.  The only thing I noticed was the same thing that  
> Rinke brought up, the schema downloads wrapped in a pre tag which  
> is probably not what the intent is.  But other than that, it's ok.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike
>
> On May 19, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Ian Horrocks wrote:
>
>> Did you get a chance to look at it yet? We are hoping to have a  
>> vote on moving to CR on Wednesday.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
>>
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
>>> Date: 16 May 2009 15:58:21 BDT
>>> To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@few.vu.nl>, mike@clarkparsia.com
>>> Cc: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, Kendall Clark  
>>> <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
>>> Subject: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
>>>
>>> Dear Rinke and Mike,
>>>
>>> As LC1 reviewers of XML Serialization can you please take a  
>>> *very* quick look at the latest version and confirm that you are  
>>> OK with any minor changes that may have occurred since the 1st  
>>> Last Call and that, in your opinion, the document is "CR-ready".
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ian
>>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 16:04:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 May 2009 16:04:10 GMT