W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Acknowlegment glitch

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:54:58 -0400
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <29109.1238504098@ubehebe>
> I believe that the following sentence in the acknowledgments sections  
> of our document is inappropriate:
> 
> """This document is the product of the OWL Working Group (see below)  
> whose members deserve recognition for their time and commitment."""
> 
> I don't recall ever seeing such a statement in an acknowledgments.  
> Isn't the actually acknowledgement sufficient?

+1 re that sentence being reworded to not thank ourselves.

Note that we have several templates here.  The standard form of
acknowledgements, I think, is:

================
{{:Shared_Acknowledgments}}
The editors extend special thanks to ...
for ....

{{:Regular_attendees}}
{{:Past_Members}}
================
and the text you're referring to is in the first,
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Shared_Acknowledgments
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Past_Members

     -- Sandro


> See:
> 	http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#ack
> 
> ""'This document reflects the joint effort of the members of the RDF  
> Core Working Group. Particular contributions were made by Jeremy  
> Carroll, Dan Connolly, Jan Grant, R. V. Guha, Graham Klyne, Ora  
> Lassilla, Brian McBride, Sergey Melnick, Jos deRoo and Patrick  
> Stickler."""
> 
> 	http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
> """This document is the result of extensive discussions within the  
> Web Ontology Working Group as a whole. The participants in this  
> Working Group included:"""
> 
> 
> 
> 	http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#section-Acknowledgements
> 
> """This specification was developed and approved for publication by  
> the W3C XSL Working Group (WG). WG approval of this specification  
> does not necessarily imply that all WG members voted for its  
> approval. The current members of the XSL WG are:"""
> 
> Why do we need to *say* that we deserve recognition just before  
> giving that recognition? Seems a bit self-praising.
> 
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
> 
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 12:55:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 31 March 2009 12:55:10 GMT