I believe that the following sentence in the acknowledgments sections of our document is inappropriate: """This document is the product of the OWL Working Group (see below) whose members deserve recognition for their time and commitment.""" I don't recall ever seeing such a statement in an acknowledgments. Isn't the actually acknowledgement sufficient? See: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#ack ""'This document reflects the joint effort of the members of the RDF Core Working Group. Particular contributions were made by Jeremy Carroll, Dan Connolly, Jan Grant, R. V. Guha, Graham Klyne, Ora Lassilla, Brian McBride, Sergey Melnick, Jos deRoo and Patrick Stickler.""" http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ """This document is the result of extensive discussions within the Web Ontology Working Group as a whole. The participants in this Working Group included:""" http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#section-Acknowledgements """This specification was developed and approved for publication by the W3C XSL Working Group (WG). WG approval of this specification does not necessarily imply that all WG members voted for its approval. The current members of the XSL WG are:""" Why do we need to *say* that we deserve recognition just before giving that recognition? Seems a bit self-praising. Cheers, Bijan.Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 11:23:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 31 March 2009 11:23:40 GMT