W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2009

review of RDF-Based Semantics

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:59:18 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20090330.165918.05789937.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
General comments:

The document is very close to being acceptable for LC.

The remaining uses of "OWL 2 Full" can stay.


Terminology change:

"IRI reference" -> "absolute IRI"


Wording changes:

1:
  "is based on a particular description logic" ->
  "is a description logic style semantics"

2.1:

  "namespace prefix and a local part" -> "prefix name and a local part"

2.2:
  I suggest removing the paragraph starting "Be informed that", as it does
  not add anything to the document.

3.1:
    3.1: Standard Prefixes

    Table 3.1 lists the standard prefix names and their prefix IRIs
    used in this document.

    Table 3.1: Standard Prefixes
    <blank>  Prefix Name  Prefix IRI

3.3:
  [Optional] Might be able to refer directly to XSD instead of S4 of
  	     SS&FS. 

7:
  "is based on a particular description logic" ->
  "is a description logic style semantics"

7.1:
  "Problem" -> "Reason"			multiple times
  "Solution for" -> "Resolution of"	multiple times
  "Complete Solution" -> "Complete Resolution"

7.3:
   Format the list so that doesn't have both bullets and numbers.
   Reword the list element "a subgraph g of G2"
   to something like "any subgraph g of G2 that is the RDF encoding ...".


Technical Changes:

1/ Align keys with treatment in direct semantics:
   5.2:
    owl:NamedIndividual	\in IC 	\subseteq IR
  5.2:
    Remove the "Informative Note".
  5.14:
    Add x,y \in NamedIndividual after the "if" in the RHS of Table 5.14

2/ Still thinking about n-ary datatypes.
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 20:57:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 March 2009 20:57:43 GMT