- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:50:28 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, 'W3C OWL Working Group' <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 30 Mar 2009, at 11:25, Ivan Herman wrote: > Hi Boris, > > Boris Motik wrote: >> > [snip] >> Thus, instead of putting the annotations inside the 'Declaration' >> terminal, you >> just put them into the 'Class' terminal. >> >> I guess the biggest question here is whether we care about the fact >> that FSS >> would seem to slightly diverge from the SS: currently FSS uses the >> 'Declaration' >> terminal that seems to match with the Declaration UML class in the >> SS. >> > > I had another, more procedural argument this morning: we should not > change things at this late stage of the game, unless there is a real > bug. So it was actually not appropriate from me to ask any kind of a > change during review last week-end:-( And there are other issues. This would make "Class" an axiom as well as an entity. I share the impulse to make small fixes, but I also agree that what is, in essence, a *stylistic* change is a matter of "oh well". In my current hand authoring in OWL/XML, the "Declaration" syntax hasn't been a big deal. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 11:04:53 UTC