Perfect! Thanks a lot Markus Ivan Markus Krötzsch wrote: > On Mittwoch, 3. Juni 2009, Ivan Herman wrote: >> Mike Smith wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 13:21, Markus Krötzsch <mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de> > wrote: >>>>> Sandro offered 'original', and it works for me. I just want to avoid >>>>> unnecessary misunderstandings with regard to the word 'normative'... >>>> Yes, I agree that there could be confusion here, and I am fine with >>>> "original" (there are cases where there is more than one "original" >>>> syntax, but this seems to be acceptable). I assume that we agree that >>>> this renaming would be an editorial change to Conformance, so it does >>>> not interact with our CR schedule. Changing this will affect some words >>>> in conformance, the property names in the test ontology, the according >>>> properties and exports of the wiki, the processing of these exports in >>>> Mike's test software, and the UI of the wiki. Each of those is minor and >>>> should not be hard to do. >>> A simplification, and what I thought Sandro and Ivan were actually >>> proposing, is to change "normative" to "original" *just* in the wiki >>> presentation of the test cases - i.e., leave Conformance and the test >>> ontologies as is. >> Indeed. I do not believe going back to the document is worthwhile and >> necessary. It is the wiki presentation of the test cases that can be >> misunderstood, so having that changed there seems to be enough... > > Good, that's even easier. I have updated the wiki accordingly: the tests now > say "original syntax", the input forms just say "syntax". > > Markus > > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 4 June 2009 07:58:39 GMT