Re: Testing the (RL) testing...

On Mittwoch, 3. Juni 2009, Ivan Herman wrote:
> Mike Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 13:21, Markus Krötzsch <mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de> 
wrote:
> >>> Sandro offered 'original', and it works for me. I just want to avoid
> >>> unnecessary misunderstandings with regard to the word 'normative'...
> >>
> >> Yes, I agree that there could be confusion here, and I am fine with
> >> "original" (there are cases where there is more than one "original"
> >> syntax, but this seems to be acceptable). I assume that we agree that
> >> this renaming would be an editorial change to Conformance, so it does
> >> not interact with our CR schedule. Changing this will affect some words
> >> in conformance, the property names in the test ontology, the according
> >> properties and exports of the wiki, the processing of these exports in
> >> Mike's test software, and the UI of the wiki. Each of those is minor and
> >> should not be hard to do.
> >
> > A simplification, and what I thought Sandro and Ivan were actually
> > proposing, is to change "normative" to "original" *just* in the wiki
> > presentation of the test cases - i.e., leave Conformance and the test
> > ontologies as is.
>
> Indeed. I do not believe going back to the document is worthwhile and
> necessary. It is the wiki presentation of the test cases that can be
> misunderstood, so having that changed there seems to be enough...

Good, that's even easier. I have updated the wiki accordingly: the tests now 
say "original syntax", the input forms just say "syntax".

Markus



-- 
Markus Krötzsch
Institut AIFB, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), 76128 Karlsruhe
phone +49 (0)721 608 7362          fax +49 (0)721 608 5998
mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de          www  http://korrekt.org