W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: LC: FH6

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:38:57 -0800
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0901270238w77a0f6b4rc1482729228f8225@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Hi Bijan,

I came up with these tags as quick handles for the issues, but without
too much though give. Please go ahead an edit the LC comments page to
fix this issue and others of the sort.

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Bijan Parsia
<bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> I think it's a bit incorrect to characterize FH6 as "Too many profiles
> (supporting Lilly's comment)". Indeed, Liily's comment on this point is a
> bit incoherent...the profiles result from research efforts but OWL 2 is
> difficult to find useful subsets of?
> I'm really not sure what the complaint is, but as it doesn't seem to be
> actionable, I think we shouldn't break it out separately. Or at least, be a
> bit cautious.
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 10:39:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:08 UTC