W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2009


From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:57:19 +0000
Message-Id: <074F9852-54F0-4AEE-95C5-3EF4C3B36D1C@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

I think it's a bit incorrect to characterize FH6 as "Too many profiles  
(supporting Lilly's comment)". Indeed, Liily's comment on this point  
is a bit incoherent...the profiles result from research efforts but  
OWL 2 is difficult to find useful subsets of?

I'm really not sure what the complaint is, but as it doesn't seem to  
be actionable, I think we shouldn't break it out separately. Or at  
least, be a bit cautious.

Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 08:57:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:08 UTC