W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2009

RE: Proposed comment for RDF (Re: ACTION-267 DONE)

From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:11:04 +0100
Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A0F989DF@judith.fzi.de>
To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
>How's this to start:
>
>We believe that the hard coded references to XML 1.0 version 2 in:
>	http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/
>and
>	http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/
>
>and to Unicode 3.0 in
>	http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/
>and
>	http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/
>
>are unduly restrictive. We believe that they should normatively refer
>to the latest versions of both standards.
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Meaning the "latest version at every time", i.e. Unicode 5 today, Unicode 6
next year, etc., right? Perhaps add some clarification such as "(i.e. the
documents should not refer to a particular version number)", because the
text might also be understood as "latest version numbers NOW", which
wouldn't really be a big win, IMHO.

Cheers,
Michael



Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 13:11:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 23 January 2009 13:11:45 GMT