RE: Proposed comment for RDF (Re: ACTION-267 DONE)

>How's this to start:
>
>We believe that the hard coded references to XML 1.0 version 2 in:
>	http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/
>and
>	http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/
>
>and to Unicode 3.0 in
>	http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/
>and
>	http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/
>
>are unduly restrictive. We believe that they should normatively refer
>to the latest versions of both standards.
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Meaning the "latest version at every time", i.e. Unicode 5 today, Unicode 6
next year, etc., right? Perhaps add some clarification such as "(i.e. the
documents should not refer to a particular version number)", because the
text might also be understood as "latest version numbers NOW", which
wouldn't really be a big win, IMHO.

Cheers,
Michael