W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Throw it away!

From: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:58:01 +0100
Message-ID: <b0ed1d660902241058r21bc4808ua5ad0e153b7388a@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
2009/2/24 Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>:
> On 24 Feb 2009, at 18:40, Christine Golbreich wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> Ah! Oxford language is easier for some of us :-)


> Don't know what that means :)

non native English people prefer the language refered in Oxford
English Dictionary, speaking expressions or idioms are more difficult
for us to catch in general, that's it


>> Members of the UFDTF and of the WG asked for keeping UCS as Appendix.
>
> Sure. And, as a member of the UFDTF and the WG, I'm asking (have asked) for
> it to be removed. I'm sorry to have connected that debate (which we've not
> haved) with this one (which was narrower...I didn't understand that when I
> made the comment).
>
>> Along with your action you advocated to have pointers to OWLED instead
>
> Yes.
>
>> Seeems that there has been today a discussion on that as well
>
> Not really.
>
>> BTW the specific concerned UCs related to N-ary came from Manchester,
>> if I remember correctly.
>
> Sure. So?
>
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
>
>



-- 
Christine
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 18:58:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 February 2009 18:58:37 GMT