W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:58:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20090223.085859.195676741.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: antoine.zimmermann@deri.org
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Fixed, thanks.

peter


From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@deri.org>
Subject: Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:12:42 +0000

> Peter, there is a minor typo in your text:
> 
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider a écrit :
>> [...]
>> Arbitrary RDF graphs can include constructs that have surprising
>> consequences.  The reasons for these are many and varied, including
>> effects on the "syntax" of OWL 2.  Because there are so many ways in
>> which the rules could incorrect, the working group has decided not to
>>   
> the rules could *be* incorrect
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> Antoine Zimmermann
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> National University of Ireland, Galway
> IDA Business Park
> Lower Dangan
> Galway, Ireland
> antoine.zimmermann@deri.org
> http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
> 
Received on Monday, 23 February 2009 13:59:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 February 2009 13:59:19 GMT