Re: draft response for LC comment 32 CO1

Peter, there is a minor typo in your text:

Peter F. Patel-Schneider a écrit :
> [...]
> Arbitrary RDF graphs can include constructs that have surprising
> consequences.  The reasons for these are many and varied, including
> effects on the "syntax" of OWL 2.  Because there are so many ways in
> which the rules could incorrect, the working group has decided not to
>   
the rules could *be* incorrect

Regards,

-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
IDA Business Park
Lower Dangan
Galway, Ireland
antoine.zimmermann@deri.org
http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/