W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

Re: 3rd Draft response to LC comment 30 (FH4)

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:28:25 +0000
Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <83404CF3-EF9E-47D9-830B-7FFDDF275A51@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Nice job, ship it.

On 20 Feb 2009, at 09:21, Ivan Herman wrote:

> Based on the comments of Bijan and Christine on the list, and some  
> other
> discussion with Ian and Alan, here is a slightly reworded version of  
> the
> answer.
>
> I think the discussion on the rationale of choosing a new syntax (ie,
> replacing the AS) was actually useful in improving our documents...
>
> Ivan
>
> -------------------------
>
> Dear Frank,
>
> Thank you for your comment
>
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0037.html 
> >
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>
> We also note the 'addendum' to your original comment in
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/0014.html

Just a typo point...given how the archive wraps email, I find it helps  
to include long uris in angle brackets.  There are mailers that will  
do the right thing with that. (Indeed, I wish the archive software  
would do the right thing :))

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Friday, 20 February 2009 09:29:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 20 February 2009 09:29:01 GMT