- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:35:43 +0000
- To: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Looks like the draft response needs to be fixed up slightly. Thanks, Ian On 19 Feb 2009, at 10:06, Bijan Parsia wrote: > On 19 Feb 2009, at 09:54, Ivan Herman wrote: > >> Uli, >> >> I must admit I lost track of this issue after a while. However, the >> Functional Syntax document does _not_ include any reference to the >> Data >> Range extension as being 'feature at risk'. > > Indeed, we decided that the "hook" part is *not* at risk, after a > lot of contention! The rest may or may not be published as a > *separate* recommendation or note. > >> As such, unless a major >> change, I do not think that this feature would be added to the main >> document, that would clearly go way beyond Last Call... > > Yes. > >> My recollection (and I may be wrong) is that [1] might be >> published as a >> separate WG note > > We haven't formally decided on the final disposition. > >> that can then be implemented, as an additional feature, >> by OWL 2 tools. But that is a different statement. > > Yes. > >> Again, I may have missed something. > > I don't think so. > > Cheers, > Bijan. > >
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 15:36:30 UTC