W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Draft response to LC comment 46

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:06:46 +0000
Message-Id: <09736D66-3323-433C-B623-D2BEA8B962AB@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
On 19 Feb 2009, at 09:54, Ivan Herman wrote:

> Uli,
> I must admit I lost track of this issue after a while. However, the
> Functional Syntax document does _not_ include any reference to the  
> Data
> Range extension as being 'feature at risk'.

Indeed, we decided that the "hook" part is *not* at risk, after a lot  
of contention! The rest may or may not be published as a *separate*  
recommendation or note.

> As such, unless a major
> change, I do not think that this feature would be added to the main
> document, that would clearly go way beyond Last Call...


> My recollection (and I may be wrong) is that [1] might be published  
> as a
> separate WG note

We haven't formally decided on the final disposition.

> that can then be implemented, as an additional feature,
> by OWL 2 tools. But that is a different statement.


> Again, I may have missed something.

I don't think so.

Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 10:03:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:09 UTC