W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Draft response to LC comment 45

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:30:28 +0000
Message-Id: <55C19740-77EC-4500-A0F0-7FBBFC594ADD@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
Looks good to me. Thanks.

Ian


On 18 Feb 2009, at 20:35, Uli Sattler wrote:

> Hi, here is a draft response  to LC comment 45. Cheers, Uli
>
> -----------
>
> Dear Marko,
>
> thank you for your comment
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/ 
> 0050.html on
> the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>
> We acknowledge the importance of implementations and tool support  
> and, indeed, implementations supporting OWL 2 will be a condition  
> for the standardization of OWL 2. It is, however, not in the scope  
> of this working group to standardize communications protocols [1].
>
> On the other hand, we will publish a document of test cases [2] and  
> would welcome help in the generation and testing of these cases.  
> So, if you think that OWLlink would be a suitable tool for testing  
> our test cases, then it would be great if you could coordinate with  
> the working group, for example Markus Kroetzsch and Mike Smith.
>
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to public-owl- 
> comments@w3.org (replying to this email should suffice). In your  
> acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied   
> with the working group's response to your comment.
>
> Regards,
> Uli Sattler
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/OWLCharter.html
> [2] http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/ 
> OWL_2_Test_Cases
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 15:31:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 February 2009 15:31:15 GMT