W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Draft response to LC comment 45

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:12:02 -0500
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0902191112h3230a708td40084813e5bb4af@mail.gmail.com>
To: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi Uli,

The pointer to the comment isn't for this response. The message
pointed to is about n-ary.
-Alan

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi, here is a draft response  to LC comment 45. Cheers, Uli
>
> -----------
>
> Dear Marko,
>
> thank you for your comment
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0050.html on
> the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>
> We acknowledge the importance of implementations and tool support and,
> indeed, implementations supporting OWL 2 will be a condition for the
> standardization of OWL 2. It is, however, not in the scope of this working
> group to standardize communications protocols [1].
>
> On the other hand, we will publish a document of test cases [2] and would
> welcome help in the generation and testing of these cases. So, if you think
> that OWLlink would be a suitable tool for testing our test cases, then it
> would be great if you could coordinate with the working group, for example
> Markus Kroetzsch and Mike Smith.
>
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to public-owl-comments@w3.org
> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let
> us know whether or not you are satisfied  with the working group's response
> to your comment.
>
> Regards,
> Uli Sattler
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/OWLCharter.html
> [2]
> http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/OWL_2_Test_Cases
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:12:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:12:41 GMT